Litigation

Appellate Services

Appellate Services

Most cases end when a trial comes to a close or the judge rules on a dispositive motion, but history has shown there are instances where laws have been wrongly applied or a tribunal has made a clear factual or legal error. Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Gefsky helps its clients appeal decisions in a variety of venues to ensure their case was properly decided by a lower court, agency, or arbitration panel, and that any errors that justify relief are rectified.

All Levels of Appeal

SMGG appellate attorneys typically get involved at the trial level in order to identify appealable issues and ensure our trial lawyers create a solid case that will effectively support the client’s position in the event of an appeal. Once the appeal has been filed, our appellate attorneys then conduct research, review the record, draft and respond to appellate briefs, and present the oral argument.

Our appellate attorneys have briefed and argued appeals in all Pennsylvania and many federal appellate courts. We have also briefed and won appeals in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. We handle appeals from:

  • The Courts of Common Pleas to the Superior Court and Commonwealth Court
  • The Pennsylvania Superior Court and the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
  • The United States Bankruptcy Court to the United States District Court
  • United States District Courts to the United States Courts of Appeals
  • Administrative agencies to the Commonwealth Court

A law firm that understands the intricacies of appellate law

Our attorneys stay current on the various appellate rules and court procedures and are skilled in developing arguments that address the purpose of the law, how it might be interpreted, and how it should be applied, as well as whether it has been applied correctly given the case at hand. 

For more information, please contact David A. Strassburger or Gretchen E. Moore.

We represent clients in a variety of Litigation areas, including:

Litigation Attorneys

Litigation Featured News

After 100 Years, Consent to Personal Jurisdiction by Registering to Do Business Remains Constitutional
After 100 Years, Consent to Personal Jurisdiction by Registering to Do Business Remains Constitutional
In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co., the Supreme Court sought to answer an important personal jurisdiction question: whether the Due Process Clause ... READ MORE
A Request for Pre and/or Post Judgment Interest is Made Via a Rule 59(e) Motion, right?  Wrong.
A Request for Pre and/or Post Judgment Interest is Made Via a Rule 59(e) Motion, right? Wrong.
Under Federal Rule 59(e) (Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment), a motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the ... READ MORE